Dealing with “humankind’s most grievous cancer”: An ultimatum for ‘Mad Dog’ Israel

Israeli settlements… in Antarctica

UK Channel 4′s Jon Snow wrote a heart-breaking piece on his recent journey to Gaza that concludes with pleas for a solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, “whatever the cost”. Good, strong words.

Despite toeing the party line on many issues, Snow has consistently made a stand with respect to Israeli barbarity. He wrote:

This is humankind’s most grievous cancer, for its cells infect conflicts in every corner of the world. We fail as humankind if we do not devise a coming-together.

Alrighty then, if we’re serious about solving this cancerous problem, let’s start by sanctioning all things Israeli. I mean REALLY sanctioning Israel to force de-apartheidization. Blockade the place. Lay siege to it. Nothing comes in or out. Once Israelis have suffered enough, they’ll start clamoring to leave.

True healing requires a multi-pronged, long-term approach, but when you’re talking about cancer in its advanced stages, you don’t dally about surgery.

Inviting Israelis (not all of them, but too many of them) to “coming-togethers” is like insisting upon repeat psychopathic offenders to undergo group therapy treatment. It only encourages them to become better manipulators. No, what’s needed here is tough love, the only language character-disturbed people understand.

In the meantime, a colony with basic facilities can be built in Antarctica, and put under UN mandate. It’ll cost a bit to house and feed the potentially substantial numbers detained there, but money is no object, right?

It’ll need high walls, perimeter fences, hi-tech security, armed guards, drones… all the comforts Israelis are used to.

Israeli refugees fleeing the siege are then given an ultimatum:

  • If you accept the new reality of living in a civilized country – on equal terms with Palestinians – you may stay.
  • If you refuse, or if interrogators have reason to suspect you are likely to react violently against this new reality in future, you earn a one-way ticket to Antarctica.
  • There can also be the option of repatriation if their country of origin is happy to take them back.

Such a scenario would never happen as long as the USA is #1, but if people are serious about ‘doing something’ before the curtains fall on this freakshow we call modern civilization, I can’t think of a more humane way to put down ‘Mad Dog Israel‘.


Agents provocateurs turn Paris pro-Palestine protests violent: Cui bono?

It’s not a coincidence that only the Paris pro-Gaza demonstrations have broken out in violence: the provocative terrorist Jewish Defence League (long-since banned in Israel and the US!) is very active there, where it works hand in hand with state security forces to ensure 100% compliance with official policy regarding the country’s twisted relationship with Israel.

Check out this RT footage from the most recent protest:

Did you notice the interesting scene at 1’19? Upon burning the Israeli flag, they proceed to hold up an Al Qaeda flag, along with the US, French and UK-sponsored Syrian ‘rebel’ flag:

Paris pro-gaza protest_agitators

So, are they with the French government, or are they against it? It’s curious that theirs and the state’s interests happen to align with the Empire’s, in complete contradiction to the outward appearance of ‘rioting against the state’, and that the net result of their actions will be the banning of peaceful protests, the very thing they are rioting against!

Again we see agents provocateurs are agitating protestors towards violence in the interest of the State.

Are they even aware that that’s what they are? Most of them probably aren’t. By this point, the ‘Al Qaeda jihadist’ meme has caught on and thousands of young Muslims in the ‘civilized world’ have fallen into the Western intelligence trap: they believe the world can be changed for the better through violent ‘Islamist’ revolution.

Probably hundreds of those protesters in Paris have been to ‘wage Jihad’ in Syria… and come back home safely. This is not ‘a problem the French government is struggling to cope with’. This is a scenario that French intelligence services actively fostered – in tandem with their British and American counterparts – to recruit, fund, train and secure safe passage and return for thousands of ‘jihadists’, generally unemployed 2nd or 3rd generation immigrants of Muslim extraction (although more and more of them are white middle-class boys looking for something to do).

Why on Earth would any state do something so apparently detrimental to its own interests?

For precisely the above scenario: banning protests, thereby stifling dissent, requires pretexts for compelling the masses to remain cowed and compliant.  The Powers That Be are braced for “mass civil unrest” as extreme weather ramps up, food shortages kick in, and people start really freaking out.


Battle of Stalingrad redux? NATO, Nazism and East Ukraine

Things are on a knife-edge in Ukraine. This from ZeroHedge:

The Washington Post is publishing a new map that shows, using information from the Royal United Services Institute, recent troop movements in the region. The graphic illustrates how military exercises conducted by Russia have left a big build-up of troops on Ukraine’s border. It also shows Ukraine’s own military moves to its borders with Russia and Moldova’s Russian-dominated enclave, Transnistria.

I watched a documentary about the Battle of Stalingrad recently, and was struck by the similarities between that momentous point in 20th century history and the clash of civilizations taking place in exactly the same region today. Here’s the pertinent part:

The Battle of Stalingrad saw fierce street fighting in the city of Stalingrad, today named Volgograd, on a bend in the great Volga River in Southern Russia. Lasting from August 1942 to February 1943, it was among the bloodiest battles in the history of warfare.

Less well known is that Hitler’s armies were substantially defeated in preceding battles that took place either side of the Seversky Donets River, which forms part of today’s border between Ukraine and Russia. Citing Soviet- and Nazi-era military records, U.S. military historian David Glantz contends that the tide turned for the Nazis in the very same region where people are today rising up against a reactionary, racially-motivated clique of virulently anti-Russian madmen transplanted into Kiev by the Western NATO military alliance.

Here we are, again, 72 years later, in the same location, witnessing the convergence of another potentially titanic battle between East and West.

It’s eerie to think that the Russians essentially defeated Nazism in the very place where NATO-trained and backed neo-fascists from Galicia, Western Ukraine, are today killing ethnic Russians. So much for ‘never again’, eh Europe?

Nazi Germany never recovered from its losses in Southern Russia.

Will Ukraine turn out to be the graveyard of the North Atlantic Empire too? Perhaps in some roundabout way; I don’t foresee Russian and U.S. troops engaging directly in Ukraine or elsewhere. But with the Atlanticists having to lie in ever more egregious ways as they maneuver their way through this crisis, they run an increasingly higher risk of exposing their hand to the slumbering Western masses and having their ‘world democratization revolution’ backfire spectacularly.

To paraphrase Twain, history may not always exactly repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes.

Is it just me, or does NATO’s logo look rather like a swastika over the ‘white power’ symbol?